<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>onsustainability.com &#187; 2009 &#187; November &#187; 30</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onsustainability.com/2009/11/30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onsustainability.com</link>
	<description>An international Conference, a scholarly Journal, a book Series, and an online knowledge Community.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Comparing US and EU Chemicals Policies</title>
		<link>http://onsustainability.com/2009/11/30/comparing-us-and-eu-chemicals-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://onsustainability.com/2009/11/30/comparing-us-and-eu-chemicals-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onsustainability.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=2061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Megan R. Schwarzman and Michael P. Wilson in Science for 20 November 2009:
By placing conditions on access to European markets, REACH has set what may become a de facto global standard. The influx of chemical information expected under REACH, as well as the potential for countries outside Europe to become markets for toxic substances [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Megan R. Schwarzman and Michael P. Wilson in <em>Science</em> for 20 November 2009:</p>
<blockquote><p>By placing conditions on access to European markets, REACH has<sup> </sup>set what may become a de facto global standard. The influx of<sup> </sup>chemical information expected under REACH, as well as the potential<sup> </sup>for countries outside Europe to become markets for toxic substances<sup> </sup>prohibited in the EU, presents other regions with an opportunity,<sup> </sup>and imperative, to retool their chemicals policies.</p>
<p>In the fall of 2009, the Obama Administration unveiled principles<sup> </sup>for U.S. chemicals policy reform, proposing that chemical producers<sup> </sup>be required to submit sufficient hazard, exposure, and use data<sup> </sup>for EPA to determine that chemicals meet a health-based safety<sup> </sup>standard (<a href="#R21"><em>21</em></a>). The principles further acknowledge the EPA&#8217;s<sup> </sup>need for authority to act on priority chemicals, reducing risks<sup> </sup>they pose to sensitive subpopulations. These principles could<sup> </sup>influence development of TSCA reform. If implemented, they could<sup> </sup>improve EPA&#8217;s ability to protect public health and the environment,<sup> </sup>while also providing the necessary incentive to move the chemicals<sup> </sup>market toward green chemistry, with the ultimate goal of placing<sup> </sup>the U.S. chemical industry on a more sustainable footing.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/326/5956/1065" target="blank">For more (subscription required)&#8230;</a></p>
<div id="attachment_2063" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 586px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2063 " title="chem-table1" src="http://onsustainability.com/files/2009/11/chem-table1.gif" alt="chem-table1" width="576" height="236" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Core Distinctions between Chemicals Policies of the United States (TSCA) and the European Union (REACH)</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://onsustainability.com/2009/11/30/comparing-us-and-eu-chemicals-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eco-Alchemy in Alberta</title>
		<link>http://onsustainability.com/2009/11/30/eco-alchemy-in-alberta/</link>
		<comments>http://onsustainability.com/2009/11/30/eco-alchemy-in-alberta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onsustainability.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=2055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Sam Kean in Science for 20 November 2009:
Environmental law says that tar sands companies must restore tailings ponds and pit mines back to &#8220;equivalent land capability,&#8221; but that phrase is contentious. Ecologists and environmentalists would prefer that every square meter of disturbed boreal forest or wetland be restored to its original state. In practice, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2056" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-2056" title="bitu-man" src="http://onsustainability.com/files/2009/11/bitu-man-150x150.gif" alt="Bitu-man. A scarecrow in a &quot;tailings pond&quot; helps keep birds out of toxic mine water. CREDIT: MAGNUM PHOTOS" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Bitu-man. A scarecrow in a &quot;tailings pond&quot; helps keep birds out of toxic mine water. CREDIT: MAGNUM PHOTOS</p></div>
<p>From Sam Kean in <em>Science</em> for 20 November 2009:</p>
<blockquote><p>Environmental law says that tar sands companies must restore<sup> </sup>tailings ponds and pit mines back to &#8220;equivalent land capability,&#8221;<sup> </sup>but that phrase is contentious. Ecologists and environmentalists<sup> </sup>would prefer that every square meter of disturbed boreal forest<sup> </sup>or wetland be restored to its original state. In practice, companies<sup> </sup>can perform a sort of eco-alchemy: Pit mines can be converted<sup> </sup>to either new land, like a forest, or a lake, while tailings<sup> </sup>ponds can become either a lake or new land. Each transformation<sup> </sup>has its own challenges and controversies.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/326/5956/1052" target="_blank">For more (subscription required)&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://onsustainability.com/2009/11/30/eco-alchemy-in-alberta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
